There are various models of portable gas grills available on the market. It is practically impossible to compare all of the available portable gas grills. But, don’t worry! You can find the information that you need below. In this article, we are going to compare two portable gas grill models available in a similar price range: Cuisinart CGG 200 and Weber Q2200. Well, Weber Q2200 is usually a little bit more expensive than Cuisinart CGG 200, but the price difference is relatively scalable. So, how do Cuisinart CGG 200 vs Weber Q2200 compare against each other?
Dimension and Portability
Portable gas grills are indeed awesome. With a portable gas grill, you no longer have to worry about what to eat and how to cook when you are going on a camping trip. Portable gas grills are compact and easy to bring along. They allow you to cook properly even when surviving in the wilderness. Due to the portability, portable gas grills are also popular for use in the yard, garden, balcony, and patio.
When looking for a portable gas grill, the size is definitely a factor that needs to be considered. Especially if you are going to bring the gas grill on a trip or travel. If the size is too large, you will probably find difficulties in bringing it and setting it up. You also want something that is lightweight so that you won’t be too tired when carrying it around. (Read also: Weber Q2000 vs. Q2200)
In general, Cuisinart CGG 200 is a little bit more compact. It measures approximately 19 4/5” x 27 4/5” x 12 4/5”. With such compact design, Cuisinart CGG 200 will not take too much space in your baggage. You can fold the side shelves into the rack if you need to make more room. Even so, it is still rather heavy. We can’t really complain because, with such durable metal housing and frame, most grillers are heavy anyway.
Weber Q2200 is quite bulky. It will need some serious space in your storage. When unfolded and the side tables are opened, the griller measures about 15.5” x 51.4” x 19.5”. Not only for storage; Weber Q2200 also requires some good clearing to set up. This model is quite heavy due to having lots of thick metal parts.
The next factor that we should consider when comparing Cuisinart CGG 200 vs Weber Q2200 is the build quality. You should consider the build quality when choosing a grill because this is a product that is supposed to last for a long time. If the build quality is bad, the grill probably won’t last for more than a year, especially if used frequently.
Despite the stylish and beautiful modern design, Cuisinart CGG 200 does not have a very good build quality. If you observe the housing carefully, you can notice that some of the important parts are not made from stainless steel. Thus, these parts are not very durable, and they may get damaged after constant exposure to heat and food acids.
Of the two options, Weber Q2200 has the better build quality. This grill boasts porcelain-enameled cast-iron cooking grates that are incredibly durable as well as cast-aluminum lid and body. There are some plastic parts, but not on the crucial parts. For sure, this grill will last for a long time, but keep in mind to put some good care to it and clean it every after use.
Ease of Use
When going out in a camping trip in a wilderness, preferably, we want something that is easy to use. If the grill takes hours to start, we may as well use firewood instead.
Fortunately, both Cuisinart CGG 200 and Weber Q2200 are very easy to use. Both models are compatible with liquid propane tanks. You can use small or large LP tanks. Cuisinart CGG 200 features a twist-to-start ignition system that is very simple and practical. There are dial controls that you can use to adjust the temperature and the flame intensity.
On the other hand, Weber Q2200 comes fully assembled right out of the box. You don’t need to assemble the grill manually, and that’s very convenient. The grill works with an electric ignition system that is also very easy and simple to use, but it requires an AAA battery. However, there are infinite burner valve settings, meaning that you can adjust the flame to great extends.
Cuisinart CGG 200 is known for its decent performance. It is able to distribute heat evenly across the cooking surface. It has a heating power of 12,000 BTU, whereas the cooking surface is approximately 240 square inches. The temperature control is precise, allowing you to reach the desired ripeness level more easily. Unsurprisingly, Cuisinart CGG 200 is often able to cook a little bit faster than Weber Q2200. This is because the cooking surface is smaller, allowing the heat to be more concentrated. However, Cuisinart CGG 200 is not as great when used in a windy condition.
On the other hand, Weber Q2200 also comes with a heating power of 12,000 BTU, but the cooking surface is 280 square inches. Don’t worry about the cooking performance because Weber’s grills have always been known for the superior heat distribution – take a look at our previous comparison, Weber Q2000 vs Q2200. In fact, Weber Q2200 offers great performance and versatility. You can use it for grilling, searing, as well as slow cooking. Weber Q2200 distributes heat perfectly across the cooking surface. Well, it may cook a little bit more slowly, especially in a windy condition. However, the cooking surface is wider, allowing you to handle more pieces at once.
Last but not least, let’s take a look at these grills’ warranties. Cuisinart CGG 200 has three-year warranties for the parts, except for enameling which warranty is only for thirty days from purchase.
Meanwhile, Weber Q2200 provides five-year warranties for the major parts such as cookbox, lid, burner tubes, cooking grates, and plastic components. The remaining parts only have two-year warranties.
All in all, in the comparison Cuisinart CGG 200 vs Weber Q2200, Weber Q2200 is definitely the winner! Weber Q2200 comes with better build quality, ensuring its reliability for a long time. It is also protected by better warranties. It has a larger cooking surface, which is useful when cooking for multiple people. Cuisinart CGG 200 is actually pretty good, but the longevity is somehow questionable.